Motion to Exclude Ballistics Expert Evidence
This brief follows an extensive Frye hearing on bullet matching evidence and incorporates extensive criticism from the scientific community, an explanation of the unintended impact that a narrow definition of the “relevant scientific community” can have, and evidence of the ways that cognitive bias impermissibly taint pattern-matching evidence.
Memo – Exclude Ballistics Evidence or Hold Daubert Hearing
Overviews shortcomings in firearm/toolmark analysis, specifically argues against any testimony of a “match”
