A Project of the University of Michigan Law School and the MDefenders Program

Based on forensic reports on latent fingerprint matching, this motion argues that fingerprint analysts can only accurately testify in terms of exclusion, rather than that two prints are a “match,” from a “common source,” or that any individual is “the source” of a latent fingerprint.

File Type: pdf
File Size: 364 KB
Categories: Evidence, Expert Testimony, Fingerprints, Forensics, Witnesses
Author: D.C., National