A Project of the University of Michigan Law School and the MDefenders Program

Data for Defenders

Submit a Document

Amicus Brief – Bite mark comparison testimony is inherently unreliable

p. 35-65 detail research demonstrating bite-mark comparison has “no empirical support” high error rates, and is not accepted within the scientific community

Download
File Type: pdf
File Size: 539 KB
Categories: Bite Mark Analysis, Evidence, Expert Testimony, Forensics, Witnesses
Author: 7th Cir., Illinois, National