Document Category: Bite Mark Analysis
| Title | Content | Date Filed | Jurisdiction | Categories | Link | hf:doc_author | hf:doc_categories |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amicus Brief – Bite mark comparison testimony is inherently unreliable | p. 35-65 detail research demonstrating bite-mark comparison has “no empirical support” high error rates, and is not accepted within the scientific community | July 15, 2022 | 7th Cir., Illinois, National | Bite Mark Analysis, Evidence, Expert Testimony, Forensics, Witnesses | 7th-cir illinois national | bite-mark-analysis evidence expert-testimony forensics witnesses |